Change Record

Forwards:

This table notify all changes which have been performed on the AEDFv2 since 2004-04-15. Note that these changes impact on the codes which are automaticaly generated from the AEDF description document as they depend directly from the table presented in this document.
Item Parent EDF table Reason Date of change Author
NUM_CORRBIN CONFIG_DESCRIPTION item removed Wed Jun 30 08:48:13 CEST 2004 fviallef
SWITCH_CYCLE_ARRAY CONFIG_DESCRIPTION size of vector modified Wed Jun 30 08:48:13 CEST 2004 fviallef
SWITCH_CYCLE_LIST CONFIG_DESCRIPTION size of vector modified Wed Jun 30 08:48:13 CEST 2004 fviallef
DATA_DESCRIPTION_ARRAY CONFIG_DESCRIPTION size of vector modified Wed Jun 30 08:48:13 CEST 2004 fviallef
EXPOSURE MAIN size of vector modified Wed Jun 30 08:48:13 CEST 2004 fviallef
TIME_CENTROID MAIN size of vector modified Wed Jun 30 08:48:13 CEST 2004 fviallef
OFFSET_ARRAY SWITCH_CYCLE size of vector modified Wed Jun 30 08:48:13 CEST 2004 fviallef
SOURCE_FLUX SOURCE_PARAMETER matrix elem. inverted Wed Jun 30 08:48:13 CEST 2004 fviallef
SOURCE_PA SOURCE_PARAMETER size of vector modified Wed Jun 30 08:48:13 CEST 2004 fviallef
FLOAT_DATA TOTAL_POWER_MONITORING size of matrix corrected Wed Jun 30 08:48:13 CEST 2004 fviallef
STEP_DURATION SWITCH_CYCLE item added Sun Jul 4 23:20:54 CEST 2004 fviallef
SUBSCAN_NUMBER SUBSCAN_NUMBER item renamed Mon Aug 9 19:49:48 EST 2004 fviallef
SUBSCAN_INTENT SUBSCAN_INTENT item renamed Mon Aug 9 19:49:48 EST 2004 fviallef
NUM_SUBSCAN NUM_SUBSCAN item renamed Mon Aug 9 19:49:48 EST 2004 fviallef
TIME_EXTRA_PRECISION MAIN, TOTAL_POWER_MONITORING and SOURCE_PARAMETER item removed Fri Oct 15 fviallef

Discussion

EXPOSURE
Although the time centroid is available in binary format per baseline for each baseband in an attachment, the EXPOSURE item in the MAIN table retains as a non-key attribute the values which are on an antenna basis. This provides a mean to have quickly a rough estimate of the exposure for each baselines if approximated by the mean value for the pairs of antennas for the baselines. For accurate values these must be extracted from the attachment.
Note that having this EXPOSURE as an item means that it is possible to use it in queries.

Issues: It has been suggested (ref correlator ICD) that the data cell should not contain useless auto and cross-correlations. This suggestion, if retained, introduces enormous complexity in the method to get these correlations from the data cell.
FrancoisViallefond: As it is anticipated that there should be only a very small fraction of useless correlations, these could be simply written as blanked or NaN values to keep the shape of the matrix in the data cell simple. This is the initial suggestion that I made and agreed with RobertLucas. However it seems that there is not a a consensus on this!
FrancoisViallefond: An alternate proposition, half-way between dropping all the useless data and keeping them all as blanked or NaN would be to drop only the useless data which involve antennas during all the integration. These antennas could be identified by using this EXPOSURE item, setting a value of 0 in these cases. The implication with this is that, to detrmine the size of the data cell require not only to know the CONFIG_DESCRIPTION_ID but also this EXPOSURE. RobertLucas does not support this idea as it is still introducing some complexity.

Questions:
  1. FrancoisViallefond:Is it really useful to have the exposure values for each baseband? A mean value seems to me sufficient keeping in mind that for accurate values they are always available in the attachment.

TIME_CENTROID
Although the time centroid is available in binary form per baseline for each baseband in an attachment, the TIME_CENTROID item in the MAIN table retains as a non-key attribute the values which are on an antenna basis. This provides a mean to have quickly a rough estimate of the time centroid on a baseline basis.
Note that the UVW item has no baseband dependency implying that it uses a mean value for TIME_CENTROID, this being adequate for its purpose as an item. Questions:
  1. FrancoisViallefond: Is it really useful to have the time centroid values for each baseband? A mean value seems to me sufficient keeping in mind that for accurate values they are always available in the attachment. Note that the UVW item has no baseband dependency implying that it uses a mean value which is adequate.
  2. FrancoisViallefond: Would it be not more convenient to replace this TIME_CENTROID item by a TIME_OFFSET. This offset would be relative to the TIME_EXTRA_PREC which is the requested time to perform the integration (or sub-integration).

  • STEP_DURATION
    This item has been added allowing to provide the durations for all the steps in a switch-cycle.
    Question: Does the hardware allow to have different durations for the different steps of the cycle.

    Comments


    gipsy
    Last modified: Wed Nov 3 15:40:32 CET 2004